hm..

Posted by: stak
Posted on: 2005-09-21 13:58:46

looks like this article (and the book in question) both agree with my previous post on google. (except of course, the author of the book did more research and went into more detail than i did). but whatever.

Name:
Comment:	Allowed expansions in comments/replies: [i]italic[/i], [u]underline[/u], [b]bold[/b], [code]code[/code], [sub]subscript[/sub], [sup]superscript[/sup], [url=http://some.url]linked text[/url]
Human verification:	=